<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Edwards&#8217; Love Child Rumor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/</link>
	<description>News and Analysis from Different Moderate Perspectives</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Edwards Love Child Scandal</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-62267</link>
		<dc:creator>John Edwards Love Child Scandal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-62267</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael van der Galien figures the &#8220;Clinton campaign wouldn’t spread a rumor as vicious like this.&#8221; Or, upon reflection, &#8220;They wouldn’t spread the rumor if they weren’t 100% sure it’s true.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael van der Galien figures the &#8220;Clinton campaign wouldn’t spread a rumor as vicious like this.&#8221; Or, upon reflection, &#8220;They wouldn’t spread the rumor if they weren’t 100% sure it’s true.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: english teacher</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11920</link>
		<dc:creator>english teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11920</guid>
		<description>does this mean bigfoot is real?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this mean bigfoot is real?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interested</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11918</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11918</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I was aware of that, Tully, but I still don’t get why Altman and Co. would orchestrate this since Obama’s the one who potentially gains the most from an Edwards slide.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Right, her machine has been too well planned to have this a known act.  Maybe someone acting on their own - but it can't be part of anyone's campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I was aware of that, Tully, but I still don’t get why Altman and Co. would orchestrate this since Obama’s the one who potentially gains the most from an Edwards slide.</p></blockquote>
<p>Right, her machine has been too well planned to have this a known act.  Maybe someone acting on their own - but it can&#8217;t be part of anyone&#8217;s campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11913</link>
		<dc:creator>C Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11913</guid>
		<description>I was aware of that, Tully, but I still don't get why Altman and Co. would orchestrate this since Obama's the one who potentially gains the most from an Edwards slide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was aware of that, Tully, but I still don&#8217;t get why Altman and Co. would orchestrate this since Obama&#8217;s the one who potentially gains the most from an Edwards slide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11909</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11909</guid>
		<description>I love the sound of incomplete knowledge.

The &lt;em&gt;Enquirer&lt;/em&gt; is wholly owned by an investment group headed and controlled by former (and potentially&lt;em&gt; future&lt;/em&gt;) Clinton Treasury Secretary Roger Altman. Draw your own conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the sound of incomplete knowledge.</p>
<p>The <em>Enquirer</em> is wholly owned by an investment group headed and controlled by former (and potentially<em> future</em>) Clinton Treasury Secretary Roger Altman. Draw your own conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JENNY</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11907</link>
		<dc:creator>JENNY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11907</guid>
		<description>&lt;!-- 		@page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } 	--&gt; 	  I JUST FOUND THIS! Look at who the producer is! http://www.webcastr.com/videos/news-politics/edwards-webisode-1-plane-truths.html Before he was running for President, John Edwards made a series of short documentaries that later vanished from the internet...until now. Produced by Reille Hunter and Mimi Hockman for Midline Groove Productions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- 		@page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } 	--> 	  I JUST FOUND THIS! Look at who the producer is! <a href="http://www.webcastr.com/videos/news-politics/edwards-webisode-1-plane-truths.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.webcastr.com/videos/news-politics/edwards-webisode-1-plane-truths.html</a> Before he was running for President, John Edwards made a series of short documentaries that later vanished from the internet&#8230;until now. Produced by Reille Hunter and Mimi Hockman for Midline Groove Productions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveinboca</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11851</link>
		<dc:creator>daveinboca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11851</guid>
		<description>Although the evidence isn't overwhelming, Mickey Kaus has noted as has the HuffPuff blog [no biased source] that the $114K &#34;documentary&#34; Rielle shot has mysteriously disappeared since it appeared in '06.  Lots of smoke there that has been smoking a long time.

As far as hypocritical self-destructive behavior, what &#34;presidential candidate&#34; would invest $18 million in an offshore hedge fund for sub-prime mortgages and at the same time call himself an advocate for the &#34;poor.&#34;  [Oh yeah, and take a half-million &#34;consulting fee&#34; for good measure.]

As P.T. Barnum once said, there's one born every minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the evidence isn&#8217;t overwhelming, Mickey Kaus has noted as has the HuffPuff blog [no biased source] that the $114K &quot;documentary&quot; Rielle shot has mysteriously disappeared since it appeared in &#8216;06.  Lots of smoke there that has been smoking a long time.</p>
<p>As far as hypocritical self-destructive behavior, what &quot;presidential candidate&quot; would invest $18 million in an offshore hedge fund for sub-prime mortgages and at the same time call himself an advocate for the &quot;poor.&quot;  [Oh yeah, and take a half-million &quot;consulting fee&quot; for good measure.]</p>
<p>As P.T. Barnum once said, there&#8217;s one born every minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11850</link>
		<dc:creator>C Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11850</guid>
		<description>LOL- Rich is referencing a recent conversation at Stubborn Facts, and the point is well taken. The more things change, the more they remain the same, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL- Rich is referencing a recent conversation at Stubborn Facts, and the point is well taken. The more things change, the more they remain the same, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Horton</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11847</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11847</guid>
		<description>Christine, you wanted a chance to do a Grover Cleveland attack ad?  Maybe it will be more relevant than you thought??!!  :-)

As in most of these things the only way Edwards can be seriously hurt by this is A) If it is true, and the world's worst coverup scheme is unravelling;  (I'd give that 5% chance that is whats going on.)  Or, B) If part of its true (maybe had the affair, but is not the not-so-pround papa), and a desperate CYA attempt is underway that makes Edwards look like a complete schmuck.  (20% chance.)  Because it is still so early either A or B might be enough to scare away those Democrats worried about &#34;electibility.&#34;

I'd say there is 75% chance that whatever this is, it will not affect the Edwards campaign too much.

We shall see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christine, you wanted a chance to do a Grover Cleveland attack ad?  Maybe it will be more relevant than you thought??!!  <img src='http://www.poligazette.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As in most of these things the only way Edwards can be seriously hurt by this is A) If it is true, and the world&#8217;s worst coverup scheme is unravelling;  (I&#8217;d give that 5% chance that is whats going on.)  Or, B) If part of its true (maybe had the affair, but is not the not-so-pround papa), and a desperate CYA attempt is underway that makes Edwards look like a complete schmuck.  (20% chance.)  Because it is still so early either A or B might be enough to scare away those Democrats worried about &quot;electibility.&quot;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say there is 75% chance that whatever this is, it will not affect the Edwards campaign too much.</p>
<p>We shall see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interested</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11782</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/2007/12/19/edwards-love-child-rumor/#comment-11782</guid>
		<description>I agree that it's not part of any campaign out there.  It would be by either someone with a vendetta against Edwards, people outside the campaign on a typical level would not have the strategic thought necessary to think about domino theories - it would be simply to down one specific candidate.  It possibly could be one deranged individual working inside a campaign who would have a strategic vision but they would be acting totally on their own.

But either way - I doubt this was the big story you were talking about Michael - if there was one, it would not be broken in the NE, it would be on mainstream news and Edwards is not much of a threat to anyone at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it&#8217;s not part of any campaign out there.  It would be by either someone with a vendetta against Edwards, people outside the campaign on a typical level would not have the strategic thought necessary to think about domino theories - it would be simply to down one specific candidate.  It possibly could be one deranged individual working inside a campaign who would have a strategic vision but they would be acting totally on their own.</p>
<p>But either way - I doubt this was the big story you were talking about Michael - if there was one, it would not be broken in the NE, it would be on mainstream news and Edwards is not much of a threat to anyone at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  is_writable() [<a href='function.is-writable'>function.is-writable</a>]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in <b>/home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php</b> on line <b>500</b><br />
