Hardball Goes After Giuliani

December 11th, 2007 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

If you take a look at the right sidebar, you see a feature of MSNBC with videos. Click on the video of MSNBC’s Hardball (about Giuliani). What’s-his-name found it, seemingly, funny to see that Giuliani laughed off most of Russert’s difficult, hard-hitting, questions.

That’s great.

Personally, I didn’t find it funny at all and I got the impression that Giuliani himself wasn’t having such a good time either. Russert asked the difficult questions which need to be answered. Giuliani’s reactions proved to me that he can’t answer some questions (in a satisfying manner). That’s not hilarious. That’s a major problem for the mayor.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Xel
    December 11th, 2007 at 22:59
    Reply | Quote | #1

    What can I say, the guy undeniably have some things going for him as well as against him, but I just see a mixture of good and bad wrapped around a core of opportunism and self-centeredness that makes Nixon and Johnson look like an open-minded, straight-shooting and humble pair of guys.

  2. C Stanley
    December 11th, 2007 at 23:09
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Hate to keep harping on you for going easier on Hillary than other candidates, Michael, but this laugh tactic was exactly what she did a few weeks back when she did the Sunday talk show circuit. Another blog did a montage then of HC and now has Giuliani, and had both film clips up today- it was the Clinton Cackle and now the Giuliani Giggle or something like that (and while I agree with you, it really isn’t funny- I have to admit that seeing the spliced tapes was pretty humorous- it was so obvious and ludicrous, hard to believe anyone would think that was a legitimate way to answer tough questions by laughing them off as though the criticism shouldn’t be taken seriously.)

  3. Xel
    December 12th, 2007 at 00:25
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Clinton and Guliani - in it for their own self-realization. That is okay.

    In it for their own self-realization, and damn what corners are cut. That is not okay.

    I just see a lot of gray inside these people, and with Obama stating bravely and clearly that "Don’t ask don’t tell" is a discredit to the US Army I can see what is wrong with the GOP and the DNC, simultaneously. Only one candidate so far has offered me that realization with one single statement.

  4. kreiz
    December 12th, 2007 at 00:43
    Reply | Quote | #4

    I’m a bit confused about the Hardball-Russert reference.  Hardball is Chris Matthews.  Russert hosts Meet the Press.  Is there a Hardball reference to MTP?  It’s Russert who is the self-appointed arbiter of candidate attacks.  After all, it was Russert’s aggressive debate moderation (not much moderate about it) that single-handedly slowed the Hillary train.

  5. C Stanley
    December 12th, 2007 at 00:50
    Reply | Quote | #5

    kreiz: yes, Matthews referenced the Giuliani MTP show.

  6. kreiz
    December 12th, 2007 at 01:27
    Reply | Quote | #6

    cool.  thanks for clearing that up.

  7. Larry
    December 12th, 2007 at 03:58
    Reply | Quote | #7

    In his arrogance, Guiliani thinks he is so 9/11 invincible that he can laugh off any probing question and the followers will blindly waddle along.

  8. kritter
    December 12th, 2007 at 03:59
    Reply | Quote | #8

    Matthews devoted a few minutes to Giuliani’s Meet the Press interview, but obsessed for weeks over Hillary’s confusing answer about giving licenses to illegal immigrants in NY. I find Giuliani’s uncomfortable laughter a lot more troubling, because a lot of it was to avoid answering questions he should be able to answer about his own conduct or judgement. I don’t get why there was so little coverage in the media about that interview.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500