NIE: A Testament to American Exceptionalism

Filed under: George W. Bush, Iran, Lead Story, Middle East, Opinion, United States — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on December 6, 2007 @ 9:08 pm CET

Today I’m happy to publish the sixth guest post of this week: it’s Rick Moran with “Release of Iran NIE a Remarkable Testament to American Exceptionalism.”

RELEASE OF IRAN NIE A REMARKABLE TESTAMENT TO AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM
by Rick Moran

Lost in all the back and forth about the National Intelligence Estimate on Iranian nukes is the shocking fact that such a document saw the light of day to begin with.

Is there any other nation on earth – perhaps in world history – that would share the deepest secrets of its intelligence gathering with its own citizens and the citizens of the world? And even more remarkable is the fact that by releasing this particular NIE, the government itself is forced to acknowledge an error in what it previously believed about an adversary – if not an outright humiliation certainly an embarrassment that every other government I can think of would avoid at all costs.

There are examples of democracies that have investigated their government’s actions and publicized wrongdoing or embarrassing incidents. But those revelations were dragged out the government as a result of official inquiries. What makes this situation different is that the release of the NIE was done voluntarily and with full recognition of the consequences.

Now before everyone starts ripping flesh off my bones for being a naive, jingoing, nationalistic, incurable romantic about America allow me to acknowledge that just about every reason you can give for why the NIE was released is probably valid. I hold no illusions that the government didn’t make the NIE available because it was bound to come out anyway. And when I say that the release was “voluntary” I don’t mean to imply that on a superficial level, the prospect that the report would be leaked didn’t play a role in the NIE’s release.

But in the end, for whatever reason, this is an extraordinary turn of events. The government could have refused to release the findings and then stonewalled when the document was leaked. Judging by the reaction on the right (and the dismissal of the key findings by the Israelis), the Administration may very well have been able to get away with not commenting on the report at all. To release it – reluctantly and trying to put the best face on the findings as they did – doesn’t obviate the fact that in some very important ways, the act of allowing the public to view the most secret deliberations of our government validates American democracy.

We live in a time when secrecy in government threatens our basic liberties as well as the concept of “open government” on which our democracy rests. This Administration has classified more documents already than any other in American history and has been more secretive in its deliberations than any other in memory. While recognizing that much of what our intelligence agencies do must necessarily remain hidden in order to protect the methods with which that intel is gathered as well as the lives of people gathering it, we as a people must demand that our leaders be as accountable for their actions as our national safety permits.

While recognizing this danger, we can celebrate when the exceptional nature of American democracy reveals itself. With great reluctance, the Bush Administration took a tiny step toward a more open government. I have no illusions that this will continue nor do I believe it redeems the Administration for the previous 7 years of obsessive, over the top secrecy.

But taken as a separate event, the release of this document should elicit feelings of pride that the core beliefs we hold about this country can be confirmed in such a public and remarkable way.

Rick Moran is Associate Editor at The American Thinker and a Pajamas Media columnist. He blogs at Right Wing Nuthouse.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim) or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.

1 C Stanley

December 6, 2007 @ 9:28 pm CET

What makes us exceptional also charts a much more difficult course for us, though. Case in point, look how quickly Ahmadinejhad seized on the propaganda victory when the report was released, and we’ve yet to see how this information going public will affect Europe’s resolve to maintain sanctions.

So, celebrate our great transparency- but remember the cost of it.

2 NIE: A Testament to American Exceptionalism

December 6, 2007 @ 9:34 pm CET

[…] PoliGazette added an interesting post on NIE: A Testament to American Exceptionalism […]

3 Economics Topics News » Blog Archive » NIE: A Testament to American Exceptionalism

December 7, 2007 @ 2:18 am CET

[…] NIE: A Testament to American ExceptionalismBy Michael van der GalienToday I’m happy to publish the sixth guest post of this week: it’s Rick Moran with “Release of Iran NIE a Remarkable Testament to American Exceptionalism. (more…) ©2007 PoliGazette. All Rights Reserved. …PoliGazette - http://poligazette.com […]

4 Chris

December 7, 2007 @ 5:30 am CET

Is there any other nation on earth – perhaps in world history – that would share the deepest secrets of its intelligence gathering with its own citizens and the citizens of the world?

I think you’re asking this rhetorically, but I think it’s a valid question.

Nothing more obnoxious than the guy who repeatedly proclaims he’s the sh*t.

5 Bielec

December 13, 2007 @ 6:06 am CET

I seriously doubt that it is transparency. To me it looks more like a sign of a power struggle at the highest levels of government, central agencies, and maybe even higher. At the same time CNN starts talking about torture, soon Fox News will air Loose Change. Climate is changing, maybe the big brother decided that this administration has lost too much credibility, maybe they see the impeachment coming and want to protect the system by sacrificing Bush, Cheney & Co. There are signs of a big game all around it.