<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patriot Act Unconstitutional, in Part</title>
	<link>http://poligazette.com/2007/09/27/patriot-act-unconstitutional-in-part/</link>
	<description>Politics and world events from a moderately liberal and conservative perspective</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jpe</title>
		<link>http://poligazette.com/2007/09/27/patriot-act-unconstitutional-in-part/#comment-7123</link>
		<dc:creator>jpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://poligazette.com/2007/09/27/patriot-act-unconstitutional-in-part/#comment-7123</guid>
		<description>This was a well-reasoned, well-written opinion, and the merits are pretty clear (probable cause is a floor, not a recommended guideline).  I'm not an expert on the doctrine of standing (the constitutional prohibition on decisions that are merely advisory - there has to be a harm that the courts can fix), but it seems like the weakest part, and the most likely grounds for a reversal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a well-reasoned, well-written opinion, and the merits are pretty clear (probable cause is a floor, not a recommended guideline).  I&#8217;m not an expert on the doctrine of standing (the constitutional prohibition on decisions that are merely advisory - there has to be a harm that the courts can fix), but it seems like the weakest part, and the most likely grounds for a reversal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncommon common sense on the Constitution &#171; Greg Prince&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://poligazette.com/2007/09/27/patriot-act-unconstitutional-in-part/#comment-7125</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncommon common sense on the Constitution &#171; Greg Prince&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://poligazette.com/2007/09/27/patriot-act-unconstitutional-in-part/#comment-7125</guid>
		<description>[...] Van Der Galien Gazette: Though much has happened since the tumultuous times after 9/11, it’s still crystal clear in my mind how the administration redefined patriot to mean a person who agreed, without question, in their plans to secure the nation, regardless of what Constitutional compromises might be required. Republicans, led by Bush and Cheney, proceeded to use patriotism as a club to beat down dissent, a heavy-handed tactic that only worked because of the word’s new meaning. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Van Der Galien Gazette: Though much has happened since the tumultuous times after 9/11, it’s still crystal clear in my mind how the administration redefined patriot to mean a person who agreed, without question, in their plans to secure the nation, regardless of what Constitutional compromises might be required. Republicans, led by Bush and Cheney, proceeded to use patriotism as a club to beat down dissent, a heavy-handed tactic that only worked because of the word’s new meaning. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xel</title>
		<link>http://poligazette.com/2007/09/27/patriot-act-unconstitutional-in-part/#comment-7127</link>
		<dc:creator>Xel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://poligazette.com/2007/09/27/patriot-act-unconstitutional-in-part/#comment-7127</guid>
		<description>"While this decision will not make the Bush administration or security hawks happy I believe that it is the correct ruling."

You kinda nailed the rationale for your belief in the same sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While this decision will not make the Bush administration or security hawks happy I believe that it is the correct ruling.&#8221;</p>
<p>You kinda nailed the rationale for your belief in the same sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
