<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Letter to Professors Mearsheimer and Walt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poligazette.com/2007/09/27/my-letter-to-professors-mearsheimer-and-walt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/09/27/my-letter-to-professors-mearsheimer-and-walt/</link>
	<description>News and Analysis from Different Moderate Perspectives</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Hynde</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/09/27/my-letter-to-professors-mearsheimer-and-walt/#comment-5643</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hynde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 01:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/my-letter-to-professors-mearsheimer-and-walt#comment-5643</guid>
		<description>The NYT has always been very one-sided. It has deliberately employed for many years more than 1 pro-Israel columnist to ensure its own editorials would always be compensated in favor of Israel. NYT columnists which are part of the Israel Lobby include William Saffire (now retired)  and David Brooks. The actual NYT editorials are never heavily criticizing Israel but at best its worst excesses. In that sense, it is closer to the Labour way of thinking than the Likud way of thinking which is useless (after all, most Israeli settlements got approved under consecutive Labour governments).
So I think you should do your homework again and look at the whole picture. You may also want to compare with European newspapers (does not yet owned by Zionist Rupert Murdoch of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYT has always been very one-sided. It has deliberately employed for many years more than 1 pro-Israel columnist to ensure its own editorials would always be compensated in favor of Israel. NYT columnists which are part of the Israel Lobby include William Saffire (now retired)  and David Brooks. The actual NYT editorials are never heavily criticizing Israel but at best its worst excesses. In that sense, it is closer to the Labour way of thinking than the Likud way of thinking which is useless (after all, most Israeli settlements got approved under consecutive Labour governments).<br />
So I think you should do your homework again and look at the whole picture. You may also want to compare with European newspapers (does not yet owned by Zionist Rupert Murdoch of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael van der Galiën</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/09/27/my-letter-to-professors-mearsheimer-and-walt/#comment-5645</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael van der Galiën</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/my-letter-to-professors-mearsheimer-and-walt#comment-5645</guid>
		<description>If you get a reponse, I hope you're allowed to publish it here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you get a reponse, I hope you&#8217;re allowed to publish it here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  is_writable() [<a href='function.is-writable'>function.is-writable</a>]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in <b>/home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php</b> on line <b>500</b><br />
