Iraq, Gonzales, and Gingrich

Filed under: 2008 elections, Iraq, Newt Gingrich — Pete Abel on July 30, 2007 @ 10:09 pm CEST

Short on time today, I regret I can’t post original material here. But if you don’t mind jumping over to TMV or Central Sanity, here are my thoughts on the …

NYT op-ed by Michael E. O’Hanlon and Kenneth M. Pollack re: the surge in Iraq

WaPo story by Dan Eggen and Amy Goldstein re: AG Gonzales’ many woes

RCP post by Blake Dvorak re: Gingrich and the modern state of Presidential-candidate debates.

As always, your comments are welcome and appreciated.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

1 Comment »

  1. 1 kritter

    July 31, 2007 @ 5:42 am CEST

    Gonzales is purposely trying to give the committee as little information as possible to protect his boss. One of his worst performances before the Senate was in April, after he had undergone intense coaching for almost a month by White House lawyers. So, the poor preparation argument doesn’t fly. I also don’t think he would have gotten into Harvard Law School if he had substandard intelligence. He is performing just as Bush wants and expects, which is why he still has so much confidence in him.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim) or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Eric Dondero: If you vote for Sarah Palin YOU ARE VOTING 3RD PARTY.  She’s a libertarian Republican. ...
  • AlexP1: …So, 40 year old history is now news….The Vietnam War as a travesty in this nation back then, so...
  • David: Thanks Michael.  I read your site nearly every day, but I don’t always have time to comment.
  • Jay_C: I’m still holding on to hope, but I’d like to see things getting better, not worse.
  • Michael: Wow… the bailout worked as expected… Like pouring gasoline on a fire… Let me guess…...

Partners

 

Your Ad Here