Byebye Two State Solution

Filed under: Neoconservatives, Palestine — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on June 15, 2007 @ 4:08 pm CEST

John Podhoretz wrote a column for the New York Post, called “Self-Rule? Try Mob Rule.” John writes:

ISRAEL’S disengagement from Gaza, completed 22 months ago, has succeeded.

It was a demonstration project of a sort - an experiment in Palestinian self-rule. If the management of Gaza had gone well, there would have been a Palestinian state within three years, tops.

OK, now speak these three words to yourself: a Palestinian state.

Finished? Good. So are the words. They won’t be coming out of anybody’s mouth again for a very, very long time - at least not in any meaningful way.

I disagree quite strongly with that. I already read some people blame Israel for what is currently happening in Palestine (and I am not just referring to Hamas): if only Israel would withdraw from every inch of Palestine and if only the West would help the Palestinians develop a strong(er) economy, then everything would be perfect in Gaza, these people argue.

Of course Podhoretz is right in so far that the Palestinians have proven that they cannot rule over themselves. The two terrorist gangs in charge of Palestine are happy fighting each other, and when they do not fight each other, they are firing rockets at Israel, Hamas is smuggling weapons into Palestine, al-Aqsa TV is teaching children to become martyrs, etc.

As Podhoretz puts it:

The Palestinians spent decades professing their detestation of Israeli occupation and demanding self-rule . . . so Israel gave them their heart’s desire.

Gaza is Judenrein - emptied of all Jews, just as Hitler dreamed Germany would be. No Jews live in Gaza. No Jews patrol Gaza. It’s Jew-Free-by-the-Sea, with a charming Mediterranean coast worth billions of dollars in tourism and trade.

So what’s the problem?

The problem is that the Jews weren’t the problem.

The problem is that the Palestinians are the problem: They are drenched in an ideology of blood and murder and suicide.

This is Palestine’s main problem: it has a culture of death. It has a culture that worships death (through terrorism). It is not a culture that celebrates life, it is not a culture that is focused on improving itself.

I am in favor of a two state solution, but I am now afraid that this will not be possible to achieve for decades to come. Change in Palestine can only come slowly. Perhaps the international community should accept that the Palestinians will not have their own state for a long time to come. Instead, the focus should be on improving every day life for Palestinians, and changing their culture. Obviously, this means that people like Abbas have to come to terms with reality as well: it means that they too have to acknowledge that their people cannot handle democracy and freedom yet, that the culture has to change first.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

3 Comments »

  1. 1 daveinboca

    June 15, 2007 @ 6:25 pm CEST

    Of course, the BDS-afflicted psychopathic left must blame anyone and everyone except Hamas and the phony Arab policies that produced just one more catastrophe in the Levant.

    Anyone who watched the BBC last night saw Hamas gunmen emptying their AK-47s and other automatic weapons into the air without a thought in their monkey brains about where the bullets would come down. The primitive savagery of the Arabs can’t think beyond their testoserone to the fact that 2 million lost souls live in the garbage dump that is Gaza, and some will get hit by said bullets. Happens all the time, but the BBC and Guardian never report where the bullets come down.

    And a brain-dead bimbo Arab reporter in Beirut called the assassination of a Sunni judge “daring” as though killing someone and ten bystanders in an amusement park was an act of bravery. This bi-yotch with a mike then said that the Shi’ites and their allies were “chipping away” at the anti-Syrian majority in Lebanese parliament, as if seven murders in the last two years was some sort of parliamentary tactic.

    I lived in the Middle East for almost a decade, speak and read Arabic, and there is little if anything more to hope from this savage medieval relic of a “civilization” that purports to be founded on a “religion of peace.” My lyin’ eyes just can’t see the peace that blowing up Sunni and Shi’ite places of worship in progressive acts of retaliation fits into the term “civilization.”

    And any female Arab bimbo who describes a car-bomb murder in an amusement park as “daring” should be fired immediately. And “chipping away” is not a term literate people use for political murders.

    These murderers are to blame, and the International Left sees them as allies, and so must finger-point at Bush, Blair, Israel, or even Global Warming before it attacks its terrorist friends on the left. Or violent reactionaries like Hamas, who are the friends of the NYT, WaPo, and other political elites who hate and oppose Bush with the irrational frenzy of true psychotic maniacs.

  2. 2 Chris

    June 15, 2007 @ 11:55 pm CEST

    Michael,
    Still think that putting Gaza under siege and giving weapons to Fatah was a good idea?

  3. 3 Michael van der Galien

    June 16, 2007 @ 6:43 am CEST

    Chris - still think talking to Hamas and giving money to them was a good idea?

    And - yes I think putting Gaza under siege was a good idea considering the rockets being fired at Israel every day.

    And now - starve Gaza.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim) or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • David: Welcome to socialism being shoved down the throat of a free market capitalistic economy. No one seems to be...
  • Eric Dondero: If you vote for Sarah Palin YOU ARE VOTING 3RD PARTY.  She’s a libertarian Republican. ...
  • AlexP1: …So, 40 year old history is now news….The Vietnam War as a travesty in this nation back then, so...
  • David: Thanks Michael.  I read your site nearly every day, but I don’t always have time to comment.
  • Jay_C: I’m still holding on to hope, but I’d like to see things getting better, not worse.

Partners

 

Your Ad Here