Comments on: Clowns

By: Interested

Interested — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:43:39 +0000

oh never said I wasn’t laughing or shaking my head.

But laws are laws. Can’t really pick and choose which laws you want followed when it seems whimsical…. to one.

By: mvdg

mvdg — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:28:06 +0000

lol yeah you’re right Interested.

On the other hand - one can laugh about this particular idiot, can’t one?

By: Interested

Interested — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:25:41 +0000

usually yes - and this one problably should as well.

But reality is he’s doing it because it’s legal and his legal right to do it.

But you nor I have the ability to determine what is frivolous or not. Only the Courts and the law does.

Ergo - write the representatives to get the law changed.

By: kritter

kritter — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:51:34 +0000

Usually these types of nuisance suits are thrown out before they get to this point. I think Pearson is using a DC consumer law, but twisting it to his own ends in a way that the law wasn’t intended. He is doing this because he can.

By: Interested

Interested — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:36:37 +0000

The judge who brought it should be removed from the bench and face disbarrment for harassing these people.

The story went on with a comment from the State office. Mainly being that as a Citizen he’s got the right to bring his grievances to court just as the rest of us do for whatever we wish for. And that It’s up to the court system to determine it valid or not. But it would be wrong to hold him professionally liable for using his Constitutional rights.

And on a legal manner - the comment was correct. You really can’t pick and choose what you think or who you think should be able to use their Constitutional rights. It is up to the Court system to treat him like any citizen.

By: George Sorwell

George Sorwell — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:48:19 +0000

I think kritter is right.

It’s obvious that Pearson is a clown who doesn’t have the temperment to be a judge. But what about the temperment of the judge who let this circus go on?

This story makes me more concerned for our judicial system than the Paris Hilton story.

By: C Stanley

C Stanley — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:09:54 +0000

Those must have been some pants.

There’s gotta be a pun in there about briefs somehow but I can’t quite get the wording right
My laughter is guilty pleasure too though, as that family has been put through hell over this frivolous lawsuit. Ridiculous, and very sad.

By: kritter

kritter — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:53:26 +0000

Why hasn’t this lawsuit been dismissed as a nuisance case a long time ago? The judge who brought it should be removed from the bench and face disbarrment for harassing these people. But it should never have come to trial in the first place as it is the kind of case that normally is heard in small claims court.???

I guess that Pearson knows how to manipulate the law, to bring it as a civil suit (no pun intended) but at the same time he sounds dangerously unstable. Reports here (this is a local story for me) had him in tears twice during his testimony.