Advise: Don’t Attack Those Who Support You

Filed under: 2008 elections, Blogging, John Edwards, Progressives — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on June 12, 2007 @ 9:55 am CEST

Dave “Mudcat” Saunders - who works for John Edwards - wrote a post for Time’s Swampland in which he lashes out to (certain) progressive bloggers. He writes:

I have bitched and moaned for years about the lack of tolerance in the elitist wing of the Democratic Party, or what I refer to as the “Metropolitan Opera Wing”. These are the people who talk of tolerance but the only true tolerance they ever exhibit is for their own pseudo-intellectual arrogance.

If you want a perfect example of how this “intolerance” is helping the Democrats lose national elections, check out the responses to Joe Klein’s post on Paris and Libby. To be clear, I have no problem with incivility. After all, I’m in the political business. However, as a pilgrim in the blogosphere, I thought blogging was for exchange of ideas, not personal attacks. Like his post or not, Klein in no way compromised the integrity of the fourth estate. This was not a news story. He was simply stating his opinion. Unless fourth estate integrity has been compromised, there is no rationale for calling him a “jackass”, “fool”, or “elite white guy”.

Dave, Dave… Dave. You don’t understand: the ‘liberal’ blogosphere is all about personal attacks. It is something like a hobby for these people; perhaps even a calling. It is what they do best. They are - normally - bad writers (with bad ideas of course), so they have to distinguish themselves from the pack by something else. Usually that results in the use of the f-word every other sentence and insulting those who might disagree with them on certain issues.

Oops: I think just did the same as I accuse them of doing.

Progressive bloggers responded to Mudcat’s post and… they’re not happy. For an impression visit:
- Taylor Marsh’s blog
- Daily Kos
- MyDD

Of course “Mudcat” has a point. Lord knows that I do not agree with progressive bloggers on many issues and I am also well aware of the aggressive nature of quite some progressive bloggers, commenters and readers but… if you want to deal with this, if you want to address this issue, it is probably best not to tell them to “go to hell.” Besides, as someone working for John Edwards, perhaps it is best not to address the issue at all - at least not publicly and not by insulting them. After all, the progressive blog community supports Edwards.

Well. It did.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

1 Comment »

  1. 1 Andy

    June 12, 2007 @ 12:22 pm CEST

    The main problem with Mudcat is that he’s a jerk who said, “you elitist urban opera watching liberals are jerks who stereotype us southern rubes.”

    Pot, meet kettle.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim) or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Jay_C: Tough it out?  How can that be?  I’m confused, It’s either they need it (and worry about the...
  • Steve: No more First Amendment? — that is why Americans have a Second Amendment. Thugs may try to stiffle my...
  • Jay_C: I am forced to agree with this: " But compared to the cost of a depression, it’s still a steal at...
  • Jay_C: Question about this…The bailout failed the first time it was brought to the House.  Since the...
  • David: Welcome to socialism being shoved down the throat of a free market capitalistic economy. No one seems to be...

Partners

 

Your Ad Here