Turkish Troops Mass at Iraq Border for Possible Strike

Filed under: Iraq, Kurds, PKK, Turkey — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on June 3, 2007 @ 6:07 pm CEST

Turkey is preparing to strike against the PKK:

From south and north, Iraq’s Kurdish region felt pressure from two sides, as saboteurs bombed a vital bridge link to Baghdad, and Turkish troops across the border massed for a possible strike.

“We won’t allow it to be turned into a battleground,” Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said Saturday of the relatively peaceful Iraqi north, a haven for anti-Turkish Kurdish guerrillas…

In an interview taped for broadcast Sunday on ABC-TV’s “This Week,” Iraq’s Kurdish president, Jalal Talabani, said Iraqi leaders had convinced the Iraq-based militants to cease their attacks, “and they did it.”

Al-Maliki, the Shiite prime minister, ending a visit to the Kurdish north on Saturday, also sought to ease the growing tensions.

“If there are some problems, we should not rely on weapons and threats, or use violence and power because this will increase tension and deepen problems,” he told a news conference in the regional capital of Irbil.

My prediction: Turkey will go in, destroy quite some PKK camps and withdraw before things truly get messy. The US will say that Turkey has to withdraw ASAP, behind the scenes, however, Rice et al. will tell the Turks that they have a certain amount of time to do what must be done. Al-Maliki et al. will threaten, but will not do much. Turkey will be out of Iraq within a couple of days time.

That’s the positive version: the negative version is that things will go terribly wrong; that the Kurds will unite and fight against the Turks; that Iraq will declare war; that Iran thinks it can do the same and attack Kurdistan as well; that the US will fight against Iran; that, in the end, we will have US vs. Iran; Iran vs. Kurdistan; Kurdistan vs. Turkey with the US in the middle and Northern Iraq will be destroyed.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

6 Comments »

  1. 1 jpe

    June 3, 2007 @ 7:43 pm CEST

    The negative option might have an unintended silver lining: nothing unites people quite like war. National identities are forged in conflict, so a Turkish invasion might go some way toward doing that, which in turn could ameliorate the Sunni-Shia conflict.

  2. 2 mvdg

    June 3, 2007 @ 7:54 pm CEST

    JPE: that is most certainly true. Ironically, that is exactly what happened in Turkey after (and during) WW1.

  3. 3 C Stanley

    June 4, 2007 @ 12:18 am CEST

    And to some extent, Iraq was more nationalistic when it was fighting Iran during Saddam’s reign (though some of the ‘unity’ was via Saddam’s iron rule too).

  4. 4 mvdg

    June 4, 2007 @ 8:31 am CEST

    Again true Christine although… are you sure that the Iraqi Shiites supported the war against Shiite Iran?

  5. 5 domajot

    June 4, 2007 @ 12:25 pm CEST

    The Kurds uniting to fight Turkey seems like a real and horrible possiblility. It would draw everyone else into the conflict, whether they like it or not.

  6. 6 mvdg

    June 4, 2007 @ 12:28 pm CEST

    Yes, it has all the ingredients in it to become a nightmare.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • wilky: It is what it is Michael. Its been this way since I started reading the papers way back in 1967. The...
  • Michael Merritt: The best way to make families a non-issue is probably to ignore those who are making them an...
  • PhilosopherP: IF it is true, and that seems to be far from certain, they need to watch the old movie "But...
  • Michael Merritt: You know I’m a critic of the media, and have even defended Palin against some of the grossly...
  • moorpipe: 11th August 2008 - Luggage Handlers Strike at Brussels Airport Baggage handlers employed by Aviapartner and...

Partners