<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Sheriff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poligazette.com/2007/05/21/a-new-sheriff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/05/21/a-new-sheriff/</link>
	<description>News and Analysis from Different Moderate Perspectives</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich Horton</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/05/21/a-new-sheriff/#comment-3939</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 20:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/a-new-sheriff#comment-3939</guid>
		<description>My point was how the media portrays such things.

One can be intellectually consistent by decrying both, OR approving of both.  Anything else is a sign of "unprincipled" thinking.

Personally, I don't have an issue with either of the attempts to change parlimentary "tradition."

In the political context lthomas and kritter are right and BOTH sides are being hypocritical.

So why does the media HAVE to mimic the political parties?  Can't they at least afford to be principled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point was how the media portrays such things.</p>
<p>One can be intellectually consistent by decrying both, OR approving of both.  Anything else is a sign of &#8220;unprincipled&#8221; thinking.</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t have an issue with either of the attempts to change parlimentary &#8220;tradition.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the political context lthomas and kritter are right and BOTH sides are being hypocritical.</p>
<p>So why does the media HAVE to mimic the political parties?  Can&#8217;t they at least afford to be principled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lthomas</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/05/21/a-new-sheriff/#comment-3941</link>
		<dc:creator>lthomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/a-new-sheriff#comment-3941</guid>
		<description>Rich Horton- The GOP decried the fillibusters when they were used by Democrats, but now seemingly have no problem with that particular parliamentary rule. Moral- don’t look for intellectual honesty from politicians- of EITHER party!

This is the point KRITTER&#62;

What goes around comes around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich Horton- The GOP decried the fillibusters when they were used by Democrats, but now seemingly have no problem with that particular parliamentary rule. Moral- don’t look for intellectual honesty from politicians- of EITHER party!</p>
<p>This is the point KRITTER&gt;</p>
<p>What goes around comes around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lthomas</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/05/21/a-new-sheriff/#comment-3943</link>
		<dc:creator>lthomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/a-new-sheriff#comment-3943</guid>
		<description>People who are in favor of this political ploy trully want to deadlock congress.

Look at these numbers.
Carter     55 recess appointments.
Reagan 243 recess appointments.
Bush 1   77 recess appointments
Clinton  140 recess appointments.
Bush 2  147 appointments in almost 7 years.

It is a tool.  It is effective.  These are not permanent appointments as they all have to be confirmed or denied.  However if left up to REID he would effectively have shut down 147 jobs most of which are extremely critical.

The republican congress would have shut down 140 of Clintons important jobs.

What goes around, comes around.

Reid is a fool.  I know that democrats are going to get up in arms over this but it is an important aspect of insuring that jobs get filled.  Even if only temporarily.

What Reids proponents are failing to see here is that REID is legislating from the Bench.  He is taking government upon his shoulders and is insuring that HE is in charge of the Government.

I repeat only the word FOOL comes to mind and now the more I think about it I think I will add Dangerous FOOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who are in favor of this political ploy trully want to deadlock congress.</p>
<p>Look at these numbers.<br />
Carter     55 recess appointments.<br />
Reagan 243 recess appointments.<br />
Bush 1   77 recess appointments<br />
Clinton  140 recess appointments.<br />
Bush 2  147 appointments in almost 7 years.</p>
<p>It is a tool.  It is effective.  These are not permanent appointments as they all have to be confirmed or denied.  However if left up to REID he would effectively have shut down 147 jobs most of which are extremely critical.</p>
<p>The republican congress would have shut down 140 of Clintons important jobs.</p>
<p>What goes around, comes around.</p>
<p>Reid is a fool.  I know that democrats are going to get up in arms over this but it is an important aspect of insuring that jobs get filled.  Even if only temporarily.</p>
<p>What Reids proponents are failing to see here is that REID is legislating from the Bench.  He is taking government upon his shoulders and is insuring that HE is in charge of the Government.</p>
<p>I repeat only the word FOOL comes to mind and now the more I think about it I think I will add Dangerous FOOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interested</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/05/21/a-new-sheriff/#comment-3942</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/a-new-sheriff#comment-3942</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Good for Reid- he’s one smart cookie! Now if he could just do something about GOP fillibusters.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

lol maybe this week - stay tuned it's only Monday.  Gaffe's to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Good for Reid- he’s one smart cookie! Now if he could just do something about GOP fillibusters.</p></blockquote>
<p>lol maybe this week - stay tuned it&#8217;s only Monday.  Gaffe&#8217;s to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/05/21/a-new-sheriff/#comment-3940</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/a-new-sheriff#comment-3940</guid>
		<description>Good for Reid- he's one smart cookie! Now if he could just do something about  GOP fillibusters.

Rich Horton- The GOP decried the fillibusters when they were used by Democrats, but now seemingly have no problem with that particular parliamentary rule. Moral- don't look for intellectual honesty from politicians- of EITHER party!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for Reid- he&#8217;s one smart cookie! Now if he could just do something about  GOP fillibusters.</p>
<p>Rich Horton- The GOP decried the fillibusters when they were used by Democrats, but now seemingly have no problem with that particular parliamentary rule. Moral- don&#8217;t look for intellectual honesty from politicians- of EITHER party!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Horton</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/05/21/a-new-sheriff/#comment-3944</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/a-new-sheriff#comment-3944</guid>
		<description>I wonder why when the GOP wanted to engage in a little parlimentary "innovation" to curtail long standing fillibuster procedures it was decried as the "nuclear option" by Democrats and the press, but to do something similar to long standing recess appointments gets embraced?

It strikes me they are "of a kind."  If you are OK with one you should be ok with the other....and vice versa.

Oh well, who needs intellectual honesty anyway!

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why when the GOP wanted to engage in a little parlimentary &#8220;innovation&#8221; to curtail long standing fillibuster procedures it was decried as the &#8220;nuclear option&#8221; by Democrats and the press, but to do something similar to long standing recess appointments gets embraced?</p>
<p>It strikes me they are &#8220;of a kind.&#8221;  If you are OK with one you should be ok with the other&#8230;.and vice versa.</p>
<p>Oh well, who needs intellectual honesty anyway!<br />
 <img src='http://www.poligazette.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: in2thefray</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/05/21/a-new-sheriff/#comment-3945</link>
		<dc:creator>in2thefray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/a-new-sheriff#comment-3945</guid>
		<description>I agree with comment 1 &#38; 3. Recess appointments are an executive tool that is available for a reason no matter the party in the Oval. I'm curious though wouldn't Reid need something resembling a quorum to say the Senate is in session ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with comment 1 &amp; 3. Recess appointments are an executive tool that is available for a reason no matter the party in the Oval. I&#8217;m curious though wouldn&#8217;t Reid need something resembling a quorum to say the Senate is in session ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interested</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/05/21/a-new-sheriff/#comment-3937</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/a-new-sheriff#comment-3937</guid>
		<description>It won't last long

Neither side of the isle likes to work very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won&#8217;t last long</p>
<p>Neither side of the isle likes to work very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/05/21/a-new-sheriff/#comment-3936</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/a-new-sheriff#comment-3936</guid>
		<description>A fool? Really?

Sounds like he found a rather clever method to defeat the recess appointment process.

Perhaps wrong, but not foolish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fool? Really?</p>
<p>Sounds like he found a rather clever method to defeat the recess appointment process.</p>
<p>Perhaps wrong, but not foolish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lthomas</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2007/05/21/a-new-sheriff/#comment-3938</link>
		<dc:creator>lthomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poligazette.com/a-new-sheriff#comment-3938</guid>
		<description>He is a fool.

F   O    O    L.

Remembering the old addage in DC Politics.  What goes around comes around.

Nothing good comes from that sorry excuse for a politician.  This is not an slam of him as a MAN.  Only a politician.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is a fool.</p>
<p>F   O    O    L.</p>
<p>Remembering the old addage in DC Politics.  What goes around comes around.</p>
<p>Nothing good comes from that sorry excuse for a politician.  This is not an slam of him as a MAN.  Only a politician.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  is_writable() [<a href='function.is-writable'>function.is-writable</a>]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in <b>/home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php</b> on line <b>500</b><br />
