Open Thread
Got news, links, something to say, nothing to say but want to say something anyway, this thread is for you.
Have fun.
Got news, links, something to say, nothing to say but want to say something anyway, this thread is for you.
Have fun.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
The Chicago Tribune, at least in the print editions, contains some interesting photos of Greensburg, Kansas both before and after the tornado.
90% of the town was destroyed, as can be clearly seen in the photos. However, only 9 people were killed, out of a population of more than 1800–little less than 0.5%
90% destruction, 0.5% dead.
Why wasn’t the death toll higher? People in that county received warnings 30 minutes prior, and Greenburg specifically 10-15 minutes prior. Residents said they had plenty of time to seek shelter, either in their house or a neighbor’s.
Lives were saved by improvements in meteorology. Not flashy, like science-fiction schemes for controlling the weather, but quite effective.
Hmm, quite good of you to point that out Alan.