Britain’s Israel Hating Mob

Filed under: Anti-Semitism, Britain, Israel, Media Criticism, Morons — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on April 27, 2007 @ 7:15 pm CEST

A great OP-ed over at The Jewish Daily Forward by Nathan Jeffay about the decision of the British National Union of Journalists to boycott Israel.

The first thing I did after I started working as a staff reporter at the London-based Jewish Chronicle was to join the National Union of Journalists. Those dependable union reps, I was told, would safeguard my every interest.

Holding on to that belief has become rather hard, now that the organization I had considered my ally in the effort to uphold informed and intelligent discussion in British society has taken its place at the front of the slogan-yelling, Israel-hating mob.

Earlier this month the National Union of Journalists voted to boycott Israeli goods. Some 40,000 journalists, including those on all the United Kingdom’s leading publications and channels, are meant to abide by the ban. The union is also committed to pressuring for “a boycott of Israeli goods similar to those boycotts in the struggles against apartheid South Africa, led by trade unions… to demand sanctions to be imposed on Israel by the British government and the United Nations.”

Already a range of unions, representing all sorts of trades and professions, have sacrificed nuance for the sake of cheap polemics. It seemed we had reached rock bottom when unions of teachers and academics, the people responsible for the education of our society, jumped on the bandwagon. But the tirade against accuracy has reached new levels if we journalists — the people who control the flow of information — are joining in.

The advancement by the National Union of Journalists of this black-and-white understanding of the Middle East conflict — this absurd notion that Israel is the absolute baddy of the Middle East and the Palestinians the fair innocents — is especially obtuse at a time when one of our own, the BBC’s Alan Johnston, is being held hostage by a Palestinian group.

Amen.

The hypocrisy is infuriating.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

7 Comments »

  1. 1 Alan

    April 27, 2007 @ 7:54 pm CEST

    Aren’t the British pretty anti-Semitic? Weren’t there a lot of British pro-Nazi groups during WWII?

  2. 2 Alan

    April 27, 2007 @ 7:54 pm CEST

    Or am I confusing history with Jack Higgins novels?

  3. 3 mvdg

    April 27, 2007 @ 8:15 pm CEST

    ;No, as far as I know that’s most certainly true.

  4. 4 Marlowe

    April 27, 2007 @ 8:15 pm CEST

    Alan said: “Aren’t the British pretty anti-Semitic? Weren’t there a lot of British pro-Nazi groups during WWII?”

    You’re thinking of Mosley, who was one of the more absurd European fascists. In the “Jeeves and Wooster” stories he was parodied brilliantly. OT, but of interest perhaps: Mosley was married to Diana Mitford, the most beautiful of the famous Mitford sisters (look them up, a fascinating family…Unity and Diana were close friends of Hitler - Eva Braun was intensely jealous of Unity…while another sister was a radical Communist. Then there was Nancy Mitford, who became a popular writer and novelist).

    Jews have always been very prominent in Britain. Disraeli - the most famous PM after Churchill - was of Jewish descent. Numerous others.

    However, British intellectuals have historically tended to be particularly fascinated with the Arabs. There’s a great line in “Lawrence of Arabia” where Faisal comments cynically on the British “love of empty spaces” as drawing Lawrence to Arabia.

    I think this current obsession Michael notes in the UK is more a “Euro” fashion for anti-Israel/anti-Semitic thinking. c.f.: The French ambassador to the UK famously dismissing Israel as that “shitty little country” (sorry about the language).

    Michael’s closing comment above is illustrative of the breathtaking bizarreness of this story…I mean, Palestinians kidnap and threaten death to a British journalist, and the British journalist union advocates a boycott of…Israel?!!

    It strains the intellect to be sure. If tomorrow al-Queda were to blow up the Houses of Parliament, there would probably be a campaign for sanctions against Israel.

    The mind boggles.

  5. 5 lthomas

    April 28, 2007 @ 1:58 am CEST

    Who dares say that Journalists have agendas. I see agendas in every story bandied around on the networks, in the papers and on the internet.

    Journalists have really lost most of my respect. While I understand they are humans like everyone else, they have let the integrity of their profession succumb to the agenda driven media now because that seems to be what sells.

    No one wants the truth anymore. They want to get their message out more then they care for the truth.

  6. 6 mvdg

    April 28, 2007 @ 2:32 am CEST

    Thomas: I share your concern regarding the media. It goes so far that somebody even told me that the CNN we see in Europe, is farther to the left and more critical / negative of / about America than the CNN you all see in America.

  7. 7 yonason

    April 29, 2007 @ 9:53 pm CEST

    SARCASM=ON

    What, the Brits hating Jews? What balderdash!
    http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1166

    And the Media, that bastion of impartiality, distorting the truth. Please, sir!
    http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1506

    I just don’t know where people come up with this nonsense!

    SARCASM=OFF

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


 

Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • R: David, Thanks for the information on Afyon. It is useful to remember that the Armenians were deported from all...
  • Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief: The Armenian genocide is an incontestable fact. No it’s not, and the...
  • Kemal: Hey  David, how many scholars that conclude no genocide occurred are funded by Armenia? None.  Does that...
  • RRRocks: Perhaps what many who dont get the puma anger fail to understand is how they believe that the election was...
  • Elif: David, we are running in vicious cycles here. First you indicated that East Anatolia was the land of Armenians...

Partners