Filed under: Political Islam, Secularism, Turkey — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on April 24, 2007 @ 3:57 pm CEST
The New York Times reports that Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan will not seek the presidency. This is quite a surprising move, at least for me. I expected him to run. That being said, I think that for Turkey, for Erdogan and for his party this is the right decision: Erdogan is too controversial a figure. Instead of Erdogan, Turkey’s governing party has chosen Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul as its candidate
Gul was expected to win the post when lawmakers vote Friday in the 55-member Parliament, where Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Justice and Development party has a majority.
Erdogan said Gul would be a candidate who would be “embraced by all of Turkey.”
Now, that might seem to be a good decision, but, as I understand it, many Turks are not happy with this choice. Why not? Gül was prime minister before Erdogan: Erdogan wanted to become Prime Minister, but could not, and then Gül became Turkey’s PM. When Gül, however, was PM, Erdogan was the de facto Prime Minister. Erdogan ruled through Gül, many people would say.
For secularists there is no difference between Gül as President or Erdogan, again, as I understand it. Both are suspected of having Islamist tendencies. Ms. Erdogan and Ms. Gül both wear scarves.
In short: both are not (considered to be) secularists.
Expect more mass demonstrations in Turkey.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments
policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or
willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim) or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email.
1 Kahraman
April 24, 2007 @ 4:46 pm CESTyou are so wrong.
i do not think there will be any mass demonstrations.
some of the people who were in that demonstration wanted erdogan to continue as prime minister.
cause they thought he was doing a great job…
2 mvdg
April 24, 2007 @ 4:51 pm CESTKahraman: well, we see things differently then. Lets wait and see what happens.