Pakistani Tribes Take on Al Qaeda

April 4th, 2007 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Pakistani trives have had it with Al Qaeda: clashes have occured between tribal forces and Al Qaeda forces (mainly foreigners). So far, approximately 60 Al Qaeda terrorists have been killed, while the tribes took some 40 foreign ‘militants’ captive.

The tribes have broken their alliance with Al Qaeda and are (finally) doing what Musharraf was supposed to do.

How it all started:

An intelligence official in Wana, the main town in South Waziristan, said about 40 Uzbeks had been killed in the fighting in which the tribesmen attacked and captured a militant stronghold in a village near Wana.

Thousands of foreign militants fled to the semi-autonomous tribal lands on the Pakistani side of the border after U.S.-led forces defeated the Taliban in Afghanistan in 2001.

The militants were given refuge by most of the Pashtun tribes that straddle the border.

But relations between the foreigners and at least some of the tribesmen broke down last month when fighting erupted after the militants tried to kill a pro-government tribal leader.

One might think that, once the tribes started attacking the Al Qaeda forces, the Pakistani army would support the tribes. Not so: “The Pakistani military says it has not been involved in the fighting.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. domajot
    April 4th, 2007 at 22:37
    Reply | Quote | #1

    A note of caution: tribes are loyal to tribes. Loyalties can switch at a moment’s notice.

    This time, I hope my caution will turn out to be unnecessary.

  2. mvdg
    April 5th, 2007 at 07:21
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Doma: very true. As I understand it, they can break alliances at any given moment (and frequently do so).

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500