A Feminist Interpretation of the Koran

March 28th, 2007 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

H/t reader and commenter ‘Interested’.

When debating about the ’soul’ or ‘essence’ of Islam, one can often hear someone say that ‘it’s all about interpretation’: the Koran is not inherently ‘violent’, it’s what people who read it and want to live by it do with it what’s important.

A Muslima took that message to (her) heart and interpretes the Koran in a more ‘feminist’ way, according to Reuters that is.

A new English-language interpretation of the Muslim Holy book the Koran challenges the use of words that feminists say have been used to justify the abuse of Islamic women.

The new version, translated by an Iranian-American, will be published in April and comes after Muslim feminists from around the world gathered in New York last November and vowed to create the first women’s council to interpret the Koran and make the religion more friendly toward women.

In the new book, Dr. Laleh Bakhtiar, a former lecturer on Islam at the University of Chicago, challenges the translation of the Arab word “idrib,” traditionally translated as “beat,” which feminists say has been used to justify abuse of women.

“Why choose to interpret the word as ‘to beat’ when it can also mean ‘to go away’,” she writes in the introduction to the new book.

Less progressive Muslims (noteworthy is that they’re all, of course, men) don’t necessarily agree with her interpretation of this verse.

Some Muslims said the new interpretation strayed from the original. Omar Abu-Namous, imam at the New York Islamic Cultural Center Mosque, questioned Bakhtiar’s interpretation…

The New York imam also said the passage she is challenging speaks of when a woman wants a divorce, and only allows a man to “hit his wife, according to the Prophet, with a ‘miswak,’” or a twig of a pencil’s length, on her hand.

To which Bakhtiar replies:

“How can you hurt someone by hitting her with a very small, short and weak thing? But sometimes the interpretation of the Koran is according to men, and sometimes they try to humiliate the woman.”

A known phenomenon in most religions of course.

I cannot but find it a bit cynical that interpreting the Koran in a way that one is not (any longer) allowed to beat up one’s wife is called a ‘feminist interpretation, but one has to start somewhere I suppose.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. domajot
    March 28th, 2007 at 21:00
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Very, very interesting. It fits in well with the assertion (which I believe) that all sacred texts are interpreted in the context of the culture (or even the individual) doing the interpreting.

    Women scholars in Islam have been active in the past.
    Their rise in the present is great to see.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500