Filed under: Barry Goldwater, Books, Conservatism — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on March 23, 2007 @ 3:25 pm CET
I’m currently reading Barry Goldwater’s The Conscience of a Conservative (which I received from a reader who appreciated my blogging. To that reader: thank you very much, it’s a great gift). When I finish it, I intend to write a long post on it, probably a review with some thoughts of my own on conservatism added (to it). For now, I will keep it short: it’s, thus far, an incredibly inspiring book. Goldwater seems to capture the soul of conservative liberalism perfectly.
Just to make you look forward to my upcoming post, here’s a quote from The Conscience of a Conservative. Barry Goldwater on the duty of the government: “Thus, for the American Conservative, there is no difficulty in identifying the day’s overriding political challenge: it is to preserve and extend freedom.“
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments
policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or
willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email.
1 Pete Abel
March 23, 2007 @ 5:27 pm CETWell, I’m already convinced I need to pick up a copy. Thanks for sharing.
2 Dan Schneider
March 23, 2007 @ 5:36 pm CETI disagree w much of Goldwaterism, but his was an honest philosophy. What Prez since has been so honest?
3 mvdg
March 23, 2007 @ 5:43 pm CETPete, yes you definitely need to pick up a copy. It’s a great, great read. If Republicans want to refocus… rethink what they’re doing, what their party stands for, they should read The Conscience of a Conservative first. Let yourself be inspired by your roots.
4 mvdg
March 23, 2007 @ 9:25 pm CETDan - I think that Goldwater was a remarkable exception.
One could argue, of course, that this is the exact reason that he didn’t become president….
He actually meant what he said.
5 Dan Schneider
March 23, 2007 @ 10:10 pm CETYes, and in Vietnam, that could have led to nuclear Armageddon.
6 Michael van der Galiën
March 23, 2007 @ 11:02 pm CETNonsense. That’s what Johnson tried to make the American people believe, but it’s not based on facts.
7 Dan Schneider
March 23, 2007 @ 11:42 pm CETHe even stated he would have just nuked the Viets. LBJ was a bastard, and many other things, but he did not force Goldwater to say anything he did not mean.
http://www.focusweb.org/philippines/content/view/58/3/
8 mvdg
March 24, 2007 @ 8:39 am CETNo, Goldwater said that one should never forget that the goal should be freedom, not, peace as such. Peace, yes, but peace through victory, not defeat. He said ‘give me freedom of give me death’. As President, he would not have used nukes, I’m quite sure, but he said that if you’ve got them, you got to be willing to use them if absolutely necessary. If you’re not… they’re useless.
9 Dan Schneider
March 24, 2007 @ 8:02 pm CETWell, he said it. If he was kidding, or not seriouis, who knows? But he said it. I’ve seenm the video interviews, and the Internet confirms it, unless this is a hoax on the Roswell scale.